The highly anticipated meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Anchorage, Alaska, ended without any concrete outcome. Despite global expectations, the three-hour-long discussion failed to produce progress on halting the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war.
Table of Contents
Both leaders struck cautious tones after the talks. Trump remarked, “There will be no deal until a real deal is made,” while Putin stressed that peace could only come if the “root causes” of the conflict were addressed. The outcome has sparked widespread debate, particularly in India, which is already facing U.S. tariff pressure linked to its energy trade with Russia.
India Awaits Relief Amid Rising U.S. Tariffs
Ahead of the summit, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Besant warned that if the Trump-Putin meeting failed to deliver results, Washington could impose even higher tariffs on Indian goods. This threat came on top of the existing 25% tariff Trump had already imposed earlier this year.
On August 7, Trump announced an additional 25% tariff on Indian imports, citing New Delhi’s continued purchase of Russian oil as the reason. These new tariffs are scheduled to take effect on August 27.
Speaking to Fox News en route to Alaska, Trump argued that Russia had “lost a major oil client” in India, which previously imported about 40% of its crude from Moscow. He added that secondary sanctions on countries like China—or possibly India—remained on the table, though he left room for negotiation.
Experts suggest that with U.S.-India trade talks set to resume on August 25, just two days before the tariff deadline, Trump may be leaving space to retreat from his tough stance. However, many analysts warn that relations between Washington and New Delhi could deteriorate further after the fruitless Trump-Putin summit.
Growing Strains in U.S.-India Relations
Michael Kugelman, director at the Wilson Centre in Washington D.C., wrote on X (formerly Twitter) that the absence of any deal between Trump and Putin could intensify U.S.-India tensions.
In recent months, Trump’s policies have increasingly overlooked India’s pursuit of strategic autonomy—its long-standing approach of maintaining balanced ties with multiple global powers. Analysts argue that New Delhi must now re-evaluate its relationship with Washington, especially as Russia and China continue to urge India not to depend too heavily on the United States.
Even symbolic gestures have added to the unease. While India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar was preparing to attend Trump’s inauguration earlier this year, Indian passengers without valid U.S. documents were reportedly removed from a flight in Amritsar, raising questions about America’s treatment of Indian citizens.
Observers note that such incidents have eroded trust. One foreign policy expert explained, “This was not a case of a trust deficit—it was a trust shock. A deficit can be repaired over time, but a shock leaves little room to recover.”
Could India Move Closer to Russia Again?
The lack of progress in U.S.-Russia talks has reignited debate over whether India might strengthen its ties with Moscow. Historically, India relied heavily on Russia for defense and energy cooperation, but since the 1990s, it has diversified its partnerships, especially with the U.S., which provided technology, jobs, and educational opportunities.
However, Trump’s recent tariff threats have fueled speculation that India may once again lean toward Russia. Yet, many experts caution that Moscow cannot serve as a full-fledged alternative.
“Russia has weakened itself significantly,” one analyst noted. “Beyond oil and nuclear weapons, it offers little to India. It lacks cutting-edge technology and its economy is in decline. Deepening ties with Russia would not yield the same benefits as engagement with the U.S.”
Moreover, Russia has become increasingly dependent on China, with whom India shares tense border disputes. In the event of a future conflict with Beijing, Moscow’s willingness to openly side with New Delhi remains uncertain.
Strategic Choices Ahead for India
Despite the tariff disputes, many experts believe there is still room for U.S.-India cooperation. Trade tensions alone do not erase decades of defense and strategic alignment between the two democracies.
“Tariffs don’t make countries enemies,” one policy analyst said. “India’s tariffs are among the highest in the world, yet that hasn’t destroyed its relations with other global partners.”
For India, the latest tariff threats may act as a wake-up call. Policymakers are being urged to accelerate domestic economic reforms, lower import duties, and encourage greater foreign investment to strengthen resilience. Some see parallels with India’s landmark 1991 economic reforms, suggesting that the current crisis could serve as another turning point.
Global Ripple Effects: Europe and China in the Spotlight
Beyond India, the deadlock in Alaska also has implications for Europe and China. European countries, heavily affected by the Russia-Ukraine conflict, had hoped for at least some progress toward de-escalation. The absence of a breakthrough means prolonged uncertainty in energy markets and continued economic strain across the continent.
Meanwhile, China remains a key player. As Russia’s largest energy buyer, Beijing has increased its reliance on discounted Russian oil and gas. Trump’s remarks hinted at possible secondary sanctions against China as well, which could escalate global trade tensions.
Conclusion: A New Phase of Geopolitical Uncertainty
The inconclusive Trump-Putin meeting underscores the fragile state of global diplomacy. For India, the stakes are especially high: it faces looming U.S. tariffs, pressure over Russian oil imports, and the challenge of balancing strategic autonomy with economic pragmatism.
While New Delhi still has space to negotiate with Washington, the current tensions highlight the urgent need for structural reforms and diversification of global partnerships. Whether India edges closer to Russia, doubles down on its U.S. ties, or charts an independent path, one thing is clear—the Alaska talks have opened a new phase of geopolitical uncertainty with far-reaching consequences.
